Writing Birthdays In French

City Council - For referral to the PUC on May 7

24/04/2010

slide discussion of observations City Urban Planning.

accepting a proposal of 18 directors di maggioranza l'assemblea di Palazzo degli Scolopi ha deciso il rinvio al 7 Maggio per dare tempo alla Commissione urbanistica di completare l'esame delle osservazioni e dare tempo ai gruppi consiliari di studiare le carte prima della discussione in aula.

Ieri sera, in apertura di seduta, è stato il capogruppo di Forza Italia verso il PDL Antonio Franceschi a presentare la proposta:"I sottoscritti Consiglieri Comunali di Oristano consci che lo strumento urbanistico possa essere approvato definitivamente in tempi celeri e brevi, ma che questo comunque non possa avvenire se non dopo aver completato l'esame, ormai giunto quasi al termine di tutte le osservazioni fatte pervenire dai cittadini, chiedono a lei Presidente del Consiglio, di porre in votazione the suspension of today's meeting on urban planning and municipal plan for the use of coastal adaptation to the landscape plan and the plan for regional hydrogeological observations and the examination and final adoption proposed reconvening the Council on the above topic for the day May 7, 2010 and the following days.
"This request - continued Franceschi - is motivated by the fact that it allows you to complete a fair and transparent bureaucracy in planning commission, probably next week.
would also be a possible next step in groups and arrive Board May 7, 2010 in the City Council with a serenity that would allow an examination of the observations and the rapid Final approval of the instrument urbanistico.Lo performance of the role of Councillor implemented with seriousness and dedication can neither be considered or interpreted as a hindrance and an obstacle to the administration. To be fair
listing the signatories: Angioi Angelo, Teeth Cristina Puddu Joseph Paratore Alberto Atzori Giampaolo, Pia Ernesto, Mauro Licata, Joseph Vacca, Gianni Garau, Flowers Maura, Stefano Contini, Cappoccia Umberto, Mario Marazzi, Coghe Renzo, Cerrone Charles, Michael Pires, Grussu Mauro, Antonio Franceschi.

The leader of the PD Peppino Marras has therefore requested a meeting of leaders at the end of which the Council voted on the proposal of the 18 advisors majority.

under the rules of the City Council a counselor spoke in favor and one against the proposal.

Cristina Teeth (PDL) has supported the request by explaining that "the only reasons that led the directors to take relatively intransigent positions all'imprescindibile need for the planning commission to examine the papers relating to the observations are only due to the functions Surveillance and control of its mandate the Board. The administration of public affairs requires the greatest attention, requires some thought and attention. We want the PUC and we worked hard to achieve this result quickly, but we also want it follow a path of honesty and transparency, as indeed we believe that citizenship should.
"The date of May 7 as the date of commencement of work - he continued - allows you to balance the needs for speed of Mayor and Councillors, with the requirements of administrative fairness and transparency. The deadlines are not suited to an administrative act which is important to the PUC. The deadlines are procedural or contractual and not in this case are procedural and do not in any way we want to believe that they can be contractual. We believe it is hardly necessary to stress that this majority has always supported the Mayor also chosen at times not entirely shared. Saying that the planning commission and Board have not worked hard, with continuity and commitment, not only unfounded, it is also unfair. We believe instead of having to ask or show how this City Council has always worked to expedite the procedural process of the PUC and with the approval of the guidelines, and with the subsequent adoption in January 2010 and finally the start of work by part of the planning commission on the day immediately following the deadline for submission of comments attached to the March 23, 2010.
Cristina Teeth For more than 160 observations deserve to be examined with care and attention.
"We believe - he added - that date of April 30 is by no means binding and the postponement of several days would the committee and groups to play a board and made careful examination of documents and requests sent by the citizens. This in no way be construed as prejudicing the best interests of the community for the benefit of citizenship and civic sense, we believe that the PUC should be approved soon and the date of May 7, we propose to start work does not cause any damage. It 'important to note that a Councillor should be and feel free not to be attacked verbally and not subjected to undue pressure from anyone. "
He concluded by stating that" The approval of the municipal development plan is usually the' administrative act that most affects the life of a community. It contains addresses and choices that affect people's lives for decades, we must prevent it from being perceived as a tool that helps to release only areas, and construction and that this is of interest only for owners of land and for manufacturers.
We are confident that the mayor should continue to be a remedy for the city and the town council is also to avoid the occurrence of unprovoked attacks unjustified and without foundation.
We are also confident that the mayor will understand our arguments and we take the opportunity to make them whole and then recommend the best wishes for a speedy and transparent good job.
Questo intervento è espressione dei Consiglieri Angioi, Franceschi, Cappoccia, Denti, Vacca, Marazzi, Puddu, Garau, Coghe, Paratore, Fiori, Cerrone, Atzori Piredda, Pia, Contini, Grussu e Licandro".

Alberto Cauli (AN) ha replicato. "Intervengo per dichiararmi contrario alla mozione dei colleghi del Consiglio e per chiedere che l'ordine dei lavori dell'aula prosegua secondo l'ordine del giorno prestabilito per oggi".

Al voto, per appello nominale (richiesta dal riformatore Giuseppe Sanna), 28 consiglieri hanno sostenuto la proposta, 4 hanno votato contro e uno si è astenuto.