2° DOSSIER CILENTO DEL CODACONS SALERNO
L’EMERGENZA AMBIENTALE
NEL TERRITORIO DEL PARCO NAZIONALE
DEL CILENTO E DEL VALLO DI DIANO
(Azioni dal 1 gennaio 2008 al 31 gennaio 2009)
DOSSIER a cura di dell’Ufficio Legale del Codacons Campania Onlus
Su iniziativa di: Prof. Enrico Marchetti, Presidente Regionale
Avv. Pierluigi Morena, Responsabile Gruppo Tutela Ambiente Codacons
Hanno collaborato: Avv. Raffaella D’Angelo, ufficio legale Codacons
Avv. Maria Cristina Rizzo, ufficio legale Codacons
Avv. Matteo Marchetti, ufficio legale Codacons
Ing. Roberto De Luca, Responsabile sede Codacons Sala Consilina
Prefazione
Wikipedia, l’enciclopedia virtuale più consultata su Internet, afferma che il Parco Nazionale del Cilento e del Vallo di Diano è nato dalla necessità di tutelare il Cilento dalle speculazioni edilizie e da un distruttivo turismo di massa.
Con l’istituzione del Parco, oltre 13 anni fa, non sono diminuite the speculation nor contain the environmental degradation.
Far from it!
The park is rich in protected areas on paper, what are the Special Protection Areas (SPAs) and Sites of Community Importance (SIC) identified with appropriate directives (Directives 79/409 EEC Birds "and 92/43" Habitat ").
The park has received other international awards and high.
It is recognized by UNESCO as a "Biosphere Reserve" (June 1997).
In 1998, then, has been recognized as "World Heritage", to be transmitted intact to future generations.
The landscape and environmental awards out there, as we see.
Protected Areas, SCI, SPA areas, very stringent laws. We tend
-at least on paper-a reconciling territorial development with nature conservation.
However, things, of course, not as they should!
There has been systematic violations of the laws that should protect the natural and cultural qualities that form the basis of the status of Park and international awards.
These violations have been repeatedly denounced by the Codacons with all the legal instruments that the law provides. There were then exposed, warnings, complaints, complaint to the prosecuting authorities of the Republic. It still appeals the TAR, repeated exposure to the Superintendence for Cultural Heritage and Landscape and the Park.
sometimes has had to invest in the European Union's growing environmental degradation. As in the case of maritime dunes of Marina di Camerota now assaulted by mass tourism.
The Dossier also incorporates actions initiated in previous years and this was added the heading Where were we? Another book is How did it go? Report the results of actions taken by the Codacons.
This is a documentary evidence of that part of the South, the associated form, is fighting for the affirmation of legality, respect for rules to counter the inertia, all’ineluttabile, alla rinuncia, alla nefasta tendenza a “svendere legalità e pezzi di territorio per acquistare consenso”.
Le iniziative del Codacons nel territorio del PNCVD
Tutela del litorale costiero.
La cementificazione della costa sta assumendo connotati sempre più preoccupanti.
I Comuni concedono concessioni a costruire in modo invasivo, anche a pochi metri dal mare, talvolta addirittura con rimozione di sabbia e di massi naturali.
In tal modo diventa spesso difficile comprendere l’effettività del ruolo di controllo, di supervisione e di tutela paesaggistica che la Legge concede ad Enti quali il PNCVD e la Soprintendenza ai Beni Culturali e per il Paesaggio.
Pisciotta. The Port
The City of Pisciotta, using EU funds (the famous Por), by widening the Marina di Pisciotta. The work gives rise to a heavy work of overbuilding.
In early 2008 the Codacons formulated to request access by requiring the Superintendence of Cultural Heritage and the Landscape of Salerno copy of any permit expansion of the Port.
Association, reviewed the documentation provided by the Superintendent, by Act of 03.04.2008 showed non-compliance of the agreements reached between the Superintendent and the City itself, in fact:
· not appeared on record the activation of any procedure for Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) in accordance with existing legislation;
· contrary to what is authorized by the Superintendency, was done by a brush <> north of the port itself, with the complete removal of the original pre-existing rocks, as well as the hauling part of the reef south of the port, over 70 m. from the shore.
Codacons seized of the matter also the region of Campania, which writes a note of 28/02/2008, stated that at the Environment Protection Sector was not any way or filed for impact assessment.
At that point, the Superintendent, after inspections of the rite, with ordering Act (Prot N.15682) of 05.27.2008 the immediate suspension of work on the brush-shaped "T" with pre-existing state recovery.
against the suspension of May 27, 2008 the City of Pisciotta filed an appeal before the Administrative Tribunal of Salerno.
Codacons administrative support to the action of the Superintendent of the reasons.
In October 2008 the Association formally requested an opinion from the Campania Region and the Ministry of Environment to determine if a work hanging in the port area park should not provide a prior authorization of the Park and that it should not predispose a prior Environmental Impact Assessment.
Region comunicava che non era concesso alcun parere di Valutazione di Impatto Ambientale e che provvedimenti adottati senza l’adozione della V.I.A. sono annullabili per violazione di legge.
Il Ministero non riscontrava la Nota del Codacons.
Ancora Pisciotta: la cementificazione a pochi metri dal mare.
In località Lacco nel Comune di Pisciotta, a pochi metri dal mare, la Cooperativa Sea Village intende realizzare circa 40 villini (!), una struttura produttiva turistica
In verità un massiccio e pesante intervento urbanistico in prossimità della costa e del mare!!
La Cooperativa richiedeva allo Sportello Unico Attività Produttive Cilento to activate the procedures for variant planning. The City of
Pisciotta (correctly) opposed the variation to the one-stop shop Cilento declaring non-compliance of the intervention to the existing urban planning instrument falling since intervention in Zone E4 (agricultural land preservation, geologically unstable) which does not provide production assistance tourist same as those proposed by the Cooperative. In addition, the City of
Pisciotta said that the production plant can certainly be located in areas specifically intended for the realization of such systems in the zoning of the PRG in the City there are still areas intended for production sites spread widely to allow not one but several projects similar to the one proposed.
The Cooperative appealed to the Administrative Tribunal of Salerno against the decision of denial.
Codacons Campania intervened in the administrative proceedings to support the position of the City and the attempt of speculation.
Agropoli.
wary prior to the Superintendence for Cultural Heritage and the Landscape of Salerno for the protection and preservation of the Bay of Trentova.
This initiative was necessary after the newspaper reports (on "The Morning" of 28.09.2007, page 43 edition of Salerno) on the signing of a Memorandum of Understanding between the City of Agropoli Italy Tourism and spa for the "use Bay Trentova "with projects that, as far as the media reported, would serve mainly as tourist accommodation.
Codacons intervened to be wary of any action voted to overbuilding and speculation that distort the shape and balance of the renowned scenic bay.
This especially in light of previous interventions that have specifically altered the ecosystem of the Bay of Trentova, consider the construction of the road to Agropoli, which runs along the hill behind the bay, which has already revolutionized landscape.
The warning indicated that Trentova on the beach, over the years, there were structures far from being environmentally friendly, without any doubt at all invasive cases of major visual impact and detrimental to the environment and the landscape, think of the expanse of cabins (white) or unsound concrete kiosk place in the middle of the bay.
E 'therefore essential to carefully control activities for safeguarding one of the last outposts of the Cilento coast-left-off as a miracle - perhaps because the availability of local governments - from the logic cement.
Where were we?
Codacons in 2008 has taken the battle to protect the Bay Trentova.
In December 2008, was presented to the City of Agropoli to request access to get copies of any preliminary plans and / or executive and no interventions in the area falls within the Bay Trentova; of any feasibility studies for the implementation of measures for tourist accommodation or recreation area Trentova; of changes in the planning restrictions and / or environmental demands in the Bay of Trentova and any opinions expressed within Minutes and eventual Services Conference. The city of Agropoli
did not respond to that request.
Codacons, in January 2009 appealed to the Administrative Tribunal of Salerno to get access to the records.
Marina di Camerota.
Oltre 30 concessioni agli stabilimenti balneari: uno degli ultimi lembi di spiaggia con dune marittime nelle mani del turismo di massa.
Il Codacons Campania, nell’ottobre 2008 ha presentato alla Commissione Europea una denuncia per apertura di Procedura di Infrazione contro lo Stato italiano per violazione delle norme comunitarie che proteggono le aree S.I.C..
La vicenda riguarda le note dune marittime presenti – un tempo – sul litorale di Marina di Camerota.
Il Parco Nazionale del Cilento e del Vallo di Diano elaborava un Piano di Gestione del S.I.C. (IT8050041) denominato “Scoglio del Mingardo e spiaggia di Cala del Cefalo” in ottemperanza del LIFE Nature project "management of the network of SCI and SPA in the Park."
The final draft of the Park, accompanied by General Report, Impact Assessment and Plans, is in fact contradictory, inconsistent and incomplete.
In summary: the project does not allow adequate protection of the Site of Community Importance, indeed the very prejudice. The Plan recognizes and could not be otherwise, that "Cala del Cefalo southern Italy represents one of the last stretches of dune vegetation colonized by psammofila characterized by plant species typical of sandy soils, in grave danger of extinction, mainly due to footfall of passing vehicles on dunes. So
Plan, in its guidelines provide, at least on paper, a control of the concessions in the stretch of dunes and coastal stressing that the resulting man-made (also) by increasing concessions to the dune beach resorts in the area results in a safe environmental damage. There is much talk about the injurious increase in accommodation (camp sites and tourist villages) and bathing facilities (dining facilities) to the detriment of the dune vegetation on the different bands and integrity of natural environments at the foot of the cliffs.
The Plan also notes that excessive human presence, due to more extensive accommodations, hurts the entire habitat, with damage also to the species of birds (gulls and herring gull) that usually nest on rocky cliffs found there. These concerns are repeated, emphatic with apprehension, even in the section on SWOT analysis.
all comments also reproduced in the Environmental Impact Assessment that was developed in the area under the SIC Management Plan of the site.
Everything on paper, of course. Ben
different is the reality!
In spite of the analysis on the problems persist SIC area and the resulting environmental damage, irreversible, which it is derived, despite declarations of good intent census and the study-University of Naples "Federico II", Department of Arboriculture, Botany and Plant Pathology, stating that in 2007-by comparing the data with those collected in 2000 - there were heavy losses of native species of Cala del Cefalo because of human disturbance, the managing body of the area, which is the same Park Authority and other stakeholders it has provided and authorized in-summer 2008 - more than 30 (!) bathing establishments throughout the area SIC Immediate shipping and behind the dunes.
These structures, however, are not even equipped with the facilities and environment-friendly bio-degradable set forth in the Plan. An enormous exploitation
and mass which is not subject to control or even minimal security activities. And to think that on one hand the managing body of the site in those plans openly argues that man-made structures, due to the above-natural causes of damage, secondly it allows use of mass tourism, and without the use of sustainable materials with the environment.
therefore "one of the last stretches of dune colonized southern Italy 'is deliberately being assured destruction.
not all.
Too many campsites are also opening in the pine forest, they tend to enclose areas with fixed means that are deemed harmful by the Plan. How vede, su un’area tanto sensibile è tollerata una diffusa illegalità, uno sfruttamento incondizionato e una mancanza di vigilanza che negli anni hanno determinato: eliminazione del sottobosco, presenza di edifici in muratura, percorsi asfaltati o compattati con materiali alloctoni, presenza di piante alloctone, mancanza di depurazione a norma delle acque reflue, sconfinamenti speculativi.
Tutela delle aree interne.
Monte San Giacomo.
Il Comune di Monte San Giacomo approntava la costruzione di una strada – avente la portata di un’autostrada ! - Monte San Giacomo, 1200 meters above sea level, particularly in the area of \u200b\u200benvironmental and landscape value and deviations from original plans.
Codacons, supporting the struggle of the Civic Committees, filed a criminal complaint to the competent judicial authorities filed a civil party in criminal proceedings before the Court of Hall incardinated Consilina against local administrators.
An application for a civil was upheld, the criminal trial is in progress.
Torraca. Wind farm go-kart track and
: SIC area (GB 8050022)
Casalbuono The mountain that overlooks the Gulf of Policastro, in the municipality of Torraca, is an area of \u200b\u200bhigh migration Many species of birds and restraint Basin Authority, for its very fragile nature of karst, and therefore unsuitable for any human activity.
However, at this area the council intends to develop two measures which, if implemented, would have caused considerable environmental damage: a go-kart track and a wind farm.
Codacons presented acts of intervention in administrative proceedings before the Tar reviews of Salerno. The Association challenged the inappropriate location of wind farms and Ie speculation about environmental certifications. The appeals were upheld.
The City appealed to the State Council, the appeal was upheld.
Protection of watercourses.
River Calore. The Consortium for Velia
Basin Reclamation dell'Alento had an original idea (!?!), even enlightening.
In July, 2008 (Act No. 1086 with Prot), the Consortium presented the Park a Preliminary Technical Data Sheet on "The interconnectedness of water scheme Sele - Alento" (Proposal for sustainable integrated development of Cilento and the Central Valley Sele).
A huge project as unnecessary and harmful.
Project - eerily named "Interconnection of the water scheme - expected to be achieved, close to the note "Gole del Calore" the diversion of the river water with concurrent execution of a tunnel underground drainage system in the floodplain of the river and the construction of a 2,500 meters long tunnel that would allow you to download the waters in the basin to be dell'Alento subsequently transferred to the irrigation system of the Consortium for Rehabilitation of Paestum. This
tropicalization to combat climate in Southern Italy, even without specifying the sources of the alleged scientific tropicalization in place.
Codacons distrusted the Campania region of Campania, the Park Authority and the Consortium of starting a project so wicked. Conservatively sent a complaint to ask the Court of Auditors shall oversee the management of funding for 161,400 euros paid to the consortium by the former Agensud for the preparation of a feasibility study on interconnection of water schemes.
also launched the campaign "Save the River Heat" against the hypothesis of uptake which he received a considerable success.
This is the text of the protest launched by Codacons:
I also joined the campaign of CODACONS CAMPANIA
"Save the River Heat - Do not swallow the toad!"
Mando my e-mail protest indignantly but civil
Park of Cilento and Vallo di Diano
FIVE TIMES to say NO!
or not to the project for collecting and diverting the waters of the River Calore at Gorges Heat;
or no to the underground drainage tunnels nell'alveo river;
or no to the Gallery of 2500 meters in the mountains of Jersey the transfer of water in the basin dell'Alento;
or no to unnecessary Conference on Services Projects devastating for the environment and the landscape;
or not to the speculations and the environmental havoc in the Cilento.
ask the Park of calls, and to decide in the next 15 days to reject Project Interconnection of the water scheme ", presented by the Consorzio Velia Alento Basin Reclamation.
NOT swallow 'OTHER toad!
How did it go? The Consortium
shelve the project!
Bussento River.
Bussento River flows almost entirely within the National Park and insists its course in the protected area (zone 1) and falls into the category of interesting places SCI. The river height of boxes in Pittari flows in a karst sinkhole where it disappears, giving rise to an underground river, and then come together again at the outside of Morigerati e poi sfociare a mare, dando vita ad un fenomeno carsico di particolare pregio e rilevanza ambientale. L’ultimo corso del fiume Bussento è ritenuto area S.I.C. (IT8050007 "Basso corso del fiume Bussento").
Tale patrimonio idrico è messo a repentaglio dal progetto che riguarda proprio l’ultimo tratto del fiume Bussento ove è previsto un intervento (Centro Canoe e strutture varie quali 3 corpi di fabbrica in ferro, vetro e legno, a due piani, con uffici, sala polifunzionale, spogliatoi, depositi, bar, mansarda praticabile ecc.) fortemente invasivo finanziato (anche) mediante POR, misura 1.9..
Inoltre, nella stessa area, o in prossimità della medesima, la Società Snam ha presentato un progetto di gasdotto che partendo da Manforte S.Giorgio in Sicilia, con tragitto sottomarino, giungerebbe alla foce del Bussento e con un tragitto in superficie costeggerebbe, e/o attraverserebbe, il fiume per un tratto di 3 km.
Tali interventi determinano, e in parte hanno già determinato, danni ambientali e paesaggistici, segnatamente alla vegetazione ripariale dove trovano rifugio e cibo uccelli migratori.
Il Codacons Campania, con atto inoltrato verso la fine dell’anno 2008, invitava l’Ente Parco e la Regione ad adottare tutte le possibili misure di protezione del sito e chiedeva alla Regione se sussistente la Valutazione di Impatto Ambientale sul progetto relativo al Centro Canoe.
La Regione Campania rimaneva inerte e non rispondeva when the Association.
18:11:08 The Ministry of the Environment (with note-Prot n.DSA 2008-0033197) in response to an access Codacons Campania stated that the project "initiative Sealine Tyrrhenian" was educated at the ministry appropriate procedure VIA.
Codacons then appealed .9 L.241/1990 article which states that "any entity, public or private stakeholders, as well as common stakeholders constituted associations or committees, which can be damaged by measure, have the right to intervene in the proceedings "and therefore requested the Ministry to intervene in the administrative procedure by trained EIA Commission.
The application has not yet had feedback.
Heat Still River. The Heat
river flows almost entirely within the National Park of Cilento and Vallo di Diano and insists its course in the protected area of \u200b\u200bthe park (zone 1) and affects many areas falls into the category of the SCI, which sites of Community importance specially classified.
is also known that the countries upstream of the famous "Gorges Heat" are not very attentive to the wastewater discharged into the stream of heat.
Codacons, in January 2009, launched a new campaign "Save the RIVER HEAT. "
was thus sent a warning to the National Park of Cilento and Vallo di Diano, by inviting the Authority to take all the more urgent and appropriate steps and measures to solve environmental problems of the River. In addition the Campania
Codacons required the Park access to documents concerning the adoption of treatment plants by municipalities of Valle del Calore, measures to control the existence of such facilities, water quality and compliance monitoring of facilities treatment to any existing law.
the body was still aware of the need to control instream flow. The
Campaign was also interested in the municipalities of Laurin, Valle Angel and Magliano Vetere, all upstream of the "Gorge", to which the information required in this case on the existence and operation of wastewater treatment plants.
Land Protection: Actions against illegal building.
is the widespread - and alas tolerated - illegal building one of the factors of greatest environmental degradation that is registered in the National Park. The longstanding problem has now assumed the characteristics of a social evil and even "cultural".
The phenomenon is extremely undervalued - or even nothing warned - by the people and institutions that tolerate it enough to not apply in most cases, law enforcement and repression which are also foreseen by the law.
It may seem paradoxical, but the Cilento was more intact before it became a protected area. In 2005 were found by police in the provincial command of Salerno 100 cases of abuse in the Park building.
As an example of deep degradation and questionable management of public affairs can not fail to report below on what has become a real case, the "IF MONTECORICE" raised forcefully by Codacons in tutte le sedi con puntuali diffide legali presentate al Comune, alla Soprintendenza, all’Ente Parco, al Prefetto, al Ministero dell’Ambiente. A queste diffide hanno fatto seguito anche azioni di carattere giudiziario.
Cosa fa l’Ente Parco contro il diffuso abusivismo edilizio?
Niente, verrebbe subito da dire.
Quasi niente, diciamo ricorrendo a formule più diplomatiche!
Il “caso Montecorice” è in questo Dossier dettagliamene descritto. Esso, come si vedrà, è l’emblema dell’inerzia culturale, dell’inefficienza amministrativa, della poca attenzione verso la legalità e il rispetto delle regole.
Il Codacons tuttavia non esauriva to "chance Montecorice" its activities aimed at environmental protection and the observance of legality.
By application access environment in September 2007 had already asked the Park Codacons copy of the Orders issued for the demolition of illegal works in the park as well as copies of Ordinances relating to the acquisition of the assets of public works present unfair within the Park.
This is to ensure the exercise of repressive power of the abuses while building the Law 394/1991 grants the President of the Park within the territory of PNCVD; power is strong and specific inhibitor and demolition works terms, in practice the same powers to the municipal manager.
Park Authority, in response to access, provided the required documentation.
from the documents has shown that the Park Authority, during his nearly fifteen years (!) Of life, only four issued demolition orders.
A small number, negligible compared to a widespread phenomenon of illegal building, with rates among the highest in Italy and in the European Community. These are made
Ordinances:
year 1998-killing of buildings sites Casalvelino;
1999-year abatement of small building in the town of Centola;
2000-year abatement of 53 buildings in the city of Montecorice;
year 2002-killing of a small building and site of small wooden structures in the municipality of Castellabate.
In December 2008, the Association reiterated its request to the Park
The demand for transparency in the fight against illegal building.
Association, given the lack of prudence in the policy of combating the phenomenon of unauthorized building, called the Park is aware of the ordinances adopted pursuant to article 29 of Law 394/1991 in 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007 and 2008 for the demolition and restoration of buildings in terms of the National Park of Cilento and Vallo di Diano.
The Park Board did not respond to requests for access.
Codacons Campania predisposed to see and use Administrative Court recognized the right of access and therefore the transparency of administration.
The eco - monsters
Montecorice. In
Montecorice, the hill overlooking the prized Loc Case del Conte, near the Red Ripe, there are, in a dominant position, a number of illegal articles.
The demolition orders are outstanding for over 20 years! Outside
gobbledygook, ordinances di demolizione non sono eseguite da oltre VENTICINQUE ANNI!
Un complesso residenziale -non completato- composto di numerosi scheletri di cemento che arrecano all’ambiente un notevolissimo pregiudizio e determinano un sicuro degrado paesaggistico tanto da essere giustamente definiti “eco-mostri”.
“Eco-mostri” che il proprietario ha strenuamente difeso in sede penale, civile e amministrativa perdendo tutte le battaglie giudiziarie stanti le conclamanti illegalità.
Più di vent’anni non sono bastati alle Autorità competenti (Comune, Ente Parco, Prefetto, Procura della Repubblica) a procedere agli abbattimenti così come previsto dalla Legge.
È questa una storia molto “italiana” that deserves to be told in detail.
Amongst them, the various stages:
-1 - Codacons filed for access to environmental Montecorice asking for documentation of the artifacts in question.
This documentation was clear the unfairness of the artifacts.
-2 - Then Codacons noted inertia Montecorice that was activated for the demolition of illegal works, required the intervention of the Prefect of Salerno to determine whether the local government persistently violated the rules of law and to adopt the necessary measures for the removal of illegal structures.
-3 - The Prefect of Salerno, with Note 10-Sep-07, requested clarification from the Mayor of Montecorice. Furthermore, the Prefect, with Note 7-Jan-08, following a new request in writing by the Codacons, informed that the 11-Oct-07 were summoned to the Prefecture, the Mayor and representatives of the Superintendent of Salerno and the Park . In that meeting the Mayor of Montecorice undertook to speed up the process for the demolition of illegal articles.
After many months nothing has changed!
Articles of cement are still there, intact.
-4 - Codacons, then, presented new instance of access to environmental Montecorice to verify any action taken by the body.
The City did not respond to entry. Il Codacons, nel gennaio 2008, ha presentato ricorso al Tar di Salerno.
-5- Il Codacons, viste le incomprensibili inerzie ed omissioni, investiva della questione il Presidente della Repubblica.
-6- Nel luglio del 2008 il Comune di Montecorice finalmente rigettava l’istanza di condono edilizio e successivamente adottava Ordinanza di abbattimento degli Eco – mostri.
-7- Il proprietario dei manufatti di cemento avverso tali atti presentava Ricorso straordinario al Presidente della Repubblica e impugnativa innanzi al Tribunale Amministrativo di Salerno.
Il Codacons interverrà in dette procedure per sostenere le ragioni del Comune.
L’ultimo paradosso: gli Eco-mostri generati con i fondi P.O.R.
Il Codacons Campania assume iniziativa per comprendere il meccanismo di gestione dei finanziamenti comunitari nell’area del Parco Nazionale.
A titolo esemplificativo, l’attenzione si concentra su DUE progetti che hanno usufruito del finanziamento P.O.R..
È l’Ente Parco ad avere un ruolo centrale nella gestione dei P.O.R., denominati P.I.T., non cambia però la sostanza: si tratta sempre di finanziamenti europei. Cooperano con l’Ente Parco nella gestione dei cospicui finanziamenti comunitari gli altri enti locali.
Veniamo ai DUE progetti; a seguito di accesso agli atti l’Associazione ottiene i documenti sul “Museo del fiume e dell’area faunistica della Lontra” nel Comune di Aquara e il International Center for the Study of Migration - Calchas-project called "The Myths" - in the town of Centola.
structures, such that the state does not appear to be active or functional, in fact, creating such heavy structures (paradoxically) a detrimental impact on the environment and the landscape because of the magnitude of the volume and use of eco-friendly materials .
complexes, as mentioned, does not work despite having given a large financial outlay.
costs?
The "Museum of the River Otter and the wildlife area" required a charge of Euro 538,102.58!
The International Center for the Study of Migration - Calchas-project called "The Myths" - (strongly supported by the Campania Region and with a favorable opinion of the Park) provided for an outlay of Euro 1,291,142.18!
only to better understand how things work .... "Certain things": the International Centre for the Study of Migration was not constructed as to be expected in a normal country, with eco - friendly materials and easily camouflaged with the surrounding environment. However, was built with heavy concrete and dominance, a true three-storey building, shaped like a "mushroom" circular.
was thus brought to completion (final) devastation Landscaping di un’intera area che scorre lunga la rinomata Mingardina, tratto prima di allora pregiatissimo.
Tanto in nome dell’osservazione della fauna migratoria……..
Tre i risultati conseguiti con (molti de)i P.O.R.:
un clamoroso sperpero di denaro pubblico;
un danno di immagine verso le istituzioni comunitarie e verso i contribuenti europei;
nessuno sviluppo, anzi edificazione di nuovi eco-mostri che degradano il paesaggio.
Il Codacons Campania ha presentato denuncia alla Corte dei Conti nazionale e comunitaria.
I nuovi POR 2007/2013
L’Associazione, visti gli sprechi che hanno caratterizzato la precedente gestione dei fondi europei, chiedeva all’Ente Parco di conoscere il programma e quindi le opere da finanziare nel territorio del Parco con fondi POR / PIT.
Il Ministero dell’Ambiente, investito per conoscenza dell’istanza del Codacons, interveniva dichiarando che il diritto alla trasparenza e alla divulgazione cede di fronte ad altre esigenze di salvaguardia di altri interessi protetti dalla normativa speciale.
L’Ente Parco non rispondeva alla richiesta di accesso.
Il Codacons Campania predisponeva Ricorso al Tribunale Amministrativo per vedere riconosciuto il diritto di accesso e quindi la trasparenza dell’attività amministrativa.
Conclusions The strong deterioration of situations highlighted by this study represent a minimal fragment of the many sufferings undergone by the environmental and landscape heritage that has a value to be received so valuable areas international recognition by UNESCO.
Neglect reached peaks of such gravity that together with the inertia of the institutions and bodies and gentlemen activity control keeps alive the question that gave the title to 2007 Dossier: Cilento, is worthy of being called Nature Park?
The question is affirmative if we concentrates on the natural beauty that are resistant to the human hand and a questionable management of resources.
More difficult is the answer if we evaluate the administrative and strategic choices. However Codacons
intention to submit the question to the attention of the public and representatives of institutions of good will. First of all those working within the European Union Commission, the investigating authorities, the Prefecture, the Ministry of Environment, the new President of the Park, the Superintendence for Cultural Heritage and Landscape, the Master's Porto. Bodies over natural target of complaints, complaints, of lawsuits, injunctions and prosecutions of Codacons.
The application can not fail to invest the representatives of UNESCO, Section for Italy, so that they do-responsibly-appropriate thoughts on whether the conditions that led to the recognition of the environmental status already assigned to the Cilento.
