Saturday, February 28, 2009

What Do I Need If My Radio Is Satellite Ready ?

civic uses at Eboli. QUESTION WITHOUT AN END?

from the Morning of Salerno
28/02/2009

Eboli. Back to City Council with an urgent question the story of the land of the Oriental Institute, a dispute over ten years on 400 acres of agricultural land that the town of Eboli donated to the College of Chinese. Covering an area of \u200b\u200bover two million square feet back to settle the political dispute that now could also have consequences on the agreement at first settlement approved by City Council and on which is the last word Advocacy of the State. A councilor of the Democratic Party, Mauro Vastola, repeats the story that had already had several comments. "We reclaim 2 million square meters of land, in a strategic area of \u200b\u200bthe Piana del Sele. On the land may already be born, the marina, waiting for the council to give back to discuss concrete guidelines "had supported the president's council, Mario Conte. The mayor Melchionda, "The City Council has ended a long standoff, resulting in the return of 150 acres of land. Now we will have exclusive ownership. " Orientale remain the St. Peter's funds, and San Pietro Petrucci: "On this land we have waived the right of civic uses," said Melchionda. Cosimo Di Benedetto Pio (Pdl): "The transaction could be closed with a better result." "The proposed settlement, which was compared to the law on civic uses of 1927 and Regional Law No. 11 of 81 - says councilor Mauro Vastola - provides a starting point to a series of doubts and interogativi. First number to be determined, according to Vastola, is the total extent of land on which the town of Eboli claims the right to civic use. Why on civic uses' owners are the citizens of Eboli, not individuals, and the same municipality. "To the City it is only the activity of management and administration of land encumbered by civic uses, and can not enjoy the same, "he adds Vastola. Insist on the same ground a number of occupants. "It is right and proper that the city council is aware of the current occupiers of the land and their legitimacy. Because there is a question to ask answer: it is true that with the reconciliation included in the proposed settlement in the land are owned by the occupiers, who may lease affrancarselo with the payment of the fee multiplied by the current fifteen boasting agricultural improvements made? "

0 comments:

Post a Comment