(MY EVENT PARK CESDUCIM ASCEA 2009-September 26, 2009 )
published the report of Dr. Leonardo GIAMBATTISTA WERE
"Because the charity of my native locomotive shook, raunai spartee makes the leaves' to the man, who now was hoarse. Then we came to where the second Round Parteli the third, and Dovesi sees horrible form of Justice art. Clearly to manifest these things, I say that we got from her bed to a landache rejecteth every plant. The dolorous forest is the ghirlandaintorno as' sad moat to it: there stayed our steps to Mainsail mainsail. It was of an arid and thick sand, not of another fashion made than coleiche was from 'the bottom of Caton already deleted. Vengeance of God, than you deiesser feared that each leggeciò which was manifest unto mine eyes! On the naked souls I saw many greggeche all were weeping very miserably, And over them seemed set a law diverse. violent controSupin was lying on the ground a few people, some were sitting all GOD collection, other art went about continually. NATURAQuella who were going 'round were more plentiful, and those were less who lay down to their torment, But had their tongues more loosed to lamentation. O'er all 'the sand, of a gradual fall, the fire piovean dilated strata, as the snow on Alp without wind. "
Avrete riconosciuto l’incipit del XIV Canto dell’Inferno, tratto dalla Divina Commedia di Dante Alighieri. Siamo nel terzo girone del settimo cerchio, e da qui fino al XVII Canto, si narra di color che “fanno forza ne la deitade, spregiando natura e sua bontade”, ovvero i violenti contro Dio, Natura ed Arte. Chi sono costoro che Dante indica tra i violenti contro natura ed arte, puniti da una pioggia di fuoco, è ben chiaro. Pur tuttavia, è mia opinione pensare che se il Sommo Poeta fosse vissuto ai giorni nostri, avrebbe indicato tra questi, non i sodomiti e gli usurai, bensì i violenti contro la natura intesa come ambiente, vale a dire i devastatori della natura, i deturpatori del paesaggio, coloro che inquinano natural resources, real estate speculators, those words, you're ignoring the nature, motivated only by a thirst for money. And that is what we want to talk, respect, respect for nature, and laws. Starting from the general, up to the particular, that the issue today.
A recent decision of a Council of State, dated September 10, 2009, then recently, states, and hopefully final, as the reasons for the protection of the landscape, are prevalent entrepreneurial activity. Now, the landscape is that business activity is protected by the Constitution (Art. 9 and Art. 41) but with this decision, the n ° 5459/2009, the Council of State sect. VI, has established delle priorità, o meglio ha indicato come interesse prevalente da tutelare, il paesaggio. Il passaggio chiave è quello finale: “ … la previsione regionale, di particolare rigore, trova piena giustificazione nell’esigenza di salvaguardare un paesaggio di incomparabile bellezza, che ha già subito attentati a causa della propensione italica ad una edificazione indiscriminata. Nella valutazione comparativa di contrapposti interessi, quello generale alla salvaguardia del paesaggio anche a tutela delle generazioni future, e quello individuale e imprenditoriale allo sviluppo degli insediamenti turistici, trova piena legittimità costituzionale la previsione regionale, estesa anche alle lottizzazioni in corso”.
In pratica contro la propensione tutta italiana di cementificare ogni luogo, la norma di salvaguardia regionale, nel proteggere l’ambiente, supera ampiamente qualsiasi censura di costituzionalità, pure ventilata dalla parte ricorrente, (per inciso nel frattempo c’è stata una pronunzia della Consulta, la n° 51 del 10 febbraio 2006 che ha ribadito la competenza della Sardegna a legiferare in materia di paesaggio vincolandola solo all’art. 3 Cost, riferito alle riforme economico-sociali) Altro spunto di interesse notevole, è che il paesaggio, quindi il territorio, va tutelato per le generazioni future. E’ un patrimonio che non deve essere dilapidato dall’uomo che vive il presente, ma valorizzato anche e soprattutto per who should come in the future, new generations in fact. And in this context fits the theme of the day. Fully represented by the preceding sentence. The civic use is, as I have often repeated, a bastion, a defensive wall against the appetites of Directors and Chief last minute (the reference to the fair sex is also a few hours ago because of a ruling junta annulled a TAR Puglia Provincial formed by men without women, so I adapt ...). The landscape in the Municipal Code (Legislative Decree 42/2004) well include land encumbered by civic uses, which are still protected by the use of forms provided by the Campania Regional Law 11/1981, to the extent that the change of destination are temporary and limited in time to the end for which he asks, and prediction of expropriation is only for supra-national interests. Correctly the tourism activities, reading the article 1 of Law No. 15 of the Campania Region November 6, 2008 "Regulations for the tourism activities, is likely to be exercised on the grounds of civic use, because it is completely compatible with the new legislation, and also because here was this Ascea the "ius casalinandi" or the right to build shelters to lay tools in view of the harvest season, or transhumance. However, that legitimizes the use of existing estimates of the use of such land for agri-tourism activities, even without, but this would require a more thorough study, said even without the authorization of the change of use, provided you comply with the dictates of Article. 6 LR 11/81, or the grant to local cooperatives. Needless to say that any profit must be reinvested always land on their own and related activities (Article 8) without the possibility of other uses. I believe we need, however, predict it, for the sake of completeness, in the municipal regulations for the exercise of civic uses. Regulations in the province of Salerno, have very few municipalities that are required, otherwise the inspector. The precise figure is that of the 153 municipalities in the Salerno province, 145 have well-land-use street. Of these, perhaps about 18 have regulations.
Finally it draws the attention of institutions responsible for the proper conduct of the farmhouse, in accordance with the new regional law, in particular Article 10, which governs the connection and prevalence. So you do not have to see cottages which were built on land civic use on their menus offering dishes of shellfish, crustaceans, etc.. Clearly products of their production, nor the farm then they become real hotels, so can accommodate receptions for hundreds of people. It would be a double violation of the law before the Law on civic uses, that would not allow the exercise of this industrial activity, then the law relating to farm. On this must exercise their powers to agencies: municipalities and regions, provinces, and in compliance with Articles 4, 5, and 6 of the said Regional Law 15/2008. I repeat what I said on other occasions, namely that any violation of laws relating to civic uses, may be contrary to art. 9 of the Constitution, which protects the landscape, as well as other environmental laws, so we could rely on Article. 141 paragraph 1, letter "A" of Legislative Decree 267/2000 (Consolidated Local Authorities) and to 'Article 126 of the Constitution providing for the dissolution of the councils respectively municipal and regional authorities.
Sorry to remember that the province has no specific competence in the matter, than those of control on environmental crime, the provincial police, and businesses, through the Office annona, besides those already mentioned above.
Therefore it is said.
